The Cyber Security Review | Wednesday, August 16, 2023
Recurring vulnerability management challenges include incomplete inventory assets, lack of resources, and inaccurate and inefficient vulnerability prioritization.
FREMONT, CA: Vulnerability management (VM) is an essential part of any organization's security strategy. Many organizations, however, have outdated conceptions of virtualization, which results in recurring vulnerability management challenges. Poor security results if these vulnerability management challenges are ignored.
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
Some of the most common recurring vulnerability management challenges are:
Inventory of assets is incomplete: The basis of effective vulnerability management is a clear, updated, and comprehensive asset inventory.
Organizations today have thousands of assets, including changing applications, databases, moving parts, shared services, third-party components, and software, creating a massive attack surface. Another significant vulnerability management challenge is the lack of a complete and updated asset inventory.
Even organizations with an asset inventory still use archaic methods such as spreadsheets and manual discovery. Using such methods can lead to distorted pictures, increasing vulnerability management risks. A critical asset may not be adequately protected if it has not been identified.
Scanning methods that are outdated: Using outdated scanning methods and tools, primarily manual scanning, is another vulnerability management challenges. Scans become more time-consuming and labor-intensive while their accuracy and effectiveness decline. When scan reports arrive, the results are redundant. False positives, inaccuracies, and human errors are also common in the results.
Vulnerability Assessment Reports are overwhelming: A vulnerability assessment report is crucial to effective remediation and executive decision-making about security. The entire VM process is undermined if these reports are inaccurate, ineffective, or difficult to understand. This leads to poor communication between teams and is a recipe for disaster.
Resources are lacking: Small and medium enterprises, especially those with limited resources, face a significant vulnerability management challenge. They lack the budget or human resources to establish an effective VM program. It is possible for SMEs to establish an effective risk-based vulnerability management program within their budget by collaborating with the right security service provider.
The episodic approach to virtualization instead of the continuous approach: Organizations will have difficulty controlling the flow of vulnerabilities and a vulnerability debt if the VM process is episodic and not continuous. Only having a continuous backlog of security issues increases vulnerability management risks. An ongoing VM process must be in place for organizations to continuously improve security and harden their security posture.
Inaccurate and inefficient vulnerability prioritization: It is nearly impossible for developers and the IT security team to patch and fix all the vulnerabilities in the organization's IT environment. Thus, it is useful to prioritize vulnerabilities according to their risk level, such as critical, high, medium, and low. Factors such as:
Asset criticality
Public exploits are available
The vulnerability is actively targeted by malware and attacks
Vulnerability severity, scope, exploitability, and potential damage
Vulnerability's popularity
More in News